Use of Small-Pin Distraction and Low-Speed, High-Torque Burring for Talar Osteochondral Allografts: Technique Tip.

Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

The Influence of Obesity on Hospital Admission After Outpatient Foot and Ankle Surgery.

We examined the association of body mass index (BMI) with sociodemographic data, medical comorbidities and hospital admission following ambulatory foot and ankle surgery. We conducted an analysis utilizing data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2007 to 2016. Adult patients who underwent ankle surgery defined as ankle arthrodesis, ankle open reduction and internal fixation, and Achilles tendon repair in the outpatient setting. We examined 6 BMI ranges: <20 kg/m2 underweight, ≥20 to <25 kg/m2 normal weight, ≥25 to <30 kg/m2 overweight, ≥30 to <40 kg/m2 obese, ≥40 kg/m2to <50 kg/m2 severely obese, and ≥50 kg/m2 extremely obese. The primary outcome was hospital admission. We performed multivariable logistic regression and reported odds ratios (OR) and their associated 95% confidence interval (CI) and considered a p value of <.05 as statistically significant. Data extraction yielded 13,454 adult patients who underwent ambulatory ankle surgery. We then performed listwise deletion to exclude cases with missing observations. After excluding 5.4% of the data, the final study population included 12,729 patients. The overall rate of hospital admission was in the population was 18.6% (2,377/12,729). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 0.03% (4/12,729). We found no significant association of BMI with hospital admission following multivariable logistic regression. We recommend that BMI alone should not be solely used to exclude patients from having ankle surgery performed in an outpatient setting, especially since this patient group makes up a significant proportion of orthopedic surgery.

The Not-So-Simple Ankle Fracture: Avoiding Problems and Pitfalls to Improve Patient Outcome.

Ankle fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopaedic surgeons and, in the setting of tibiotalar instability, are usually treated surgically. Although orthopaedic surgeons from diverse educational backgrounds often feel comfortable treating such fractures, many controversies and clinical challenges remain. A detailed understanding of the unique issues presented by each patient as well as the best available treatments are required to optimize outcome. Given the unforgiving soft-tissue envelope and the particular importance of both precise reduction and absolute stability, poorly conceived and executed surgery will predictably end in compromised patient outcomes. The purpose of this manuscript is to update practicing surgeons on the best strategies for improving patient outcome after ankle fracture. The focus will be on some of the more nuanced, controversial, and complex ankle fracture-related topics, both in terms of decision making and technical execution. These will include the optimal management of posterior malleolus fractures and syndesmosis injuries as well as the best strategies to minimizing risks in poor hosts such as diabetics, obese patients, and the frail elderly. We will also provide a framework with which surgeons can approach the salvage of patients in whom the initial management has failed.

Mallet hallux injury: A case report and literature review.

Mallet injury is associated with variable degrees of extensor hallucis longus tendon tearing, ultimately leading to the well-known mallet toe deformity; this entity, commonly described at the lesser toes and fingers, has rarely been reported at the hallux. We present a surgically proven case of mallet hallux injury with radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging assessment and review the literature, including clinical and radiological findings, along with basic treatment concepts.

Suture-method versus Through-the-needle Catheters for Continuous Popliteal-sciatic Nerve Blocks: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The basic perineural catheter design has changed minimally since inception, with the catheter introduced through or over a straight needle. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently cleared a novel perineural catheter design comprising a catheter attached to the back of a suture-shaped needle that is inserted, advanced along the arc of its curvature pulling the catheter past the target nerve, and then exited through the skin in a second location. The authors hypothesized that analgesia would be noninferior using the new versus traditional catheter design in the first two days after painful foot/ankle surgery with a primary outcome of average pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale. METHODS: Subjects undergoing painful foot or ankle surgery with a continuous supraparaneural popliteal-sciatic nerve block 5 cm proximal to the bifurcation were randomized to either a suture-type or through-the-needle catheter and subsequent 3-day 0.2% ropivacaine infusion (basal 6 ml/h, bolus 4 ml, lockout 30 min). Subjects received daily follow-up for the first four days after surgery, including assessment for evidence of malfunction or dislodgement of the catheters. RESULTS: During the first two postoperative days the mean ± SD average pain scores were lower in subjects with the suture-catheter (n = 35) compared with the through-the-needle (n = 35) group (2.7 ± 2.4 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4) and found to be statistically noninferior (95% CI, -1.9 to 0.6; P < 0.001). No suture-style catheter was completely dislodged (0%), whereas the tips of three (9%) traditional catheters were found outside of the skin before purposeful removal on postoperative day 3 (P = 0.239). CONCLUSIONS: Suture-type perineural catheters provided noninferior analgesia compared with traditional catheters for continuous popliteal-sciatic blocks after painful foot and ankle surgery. The new catheter design appears to be a viable alternative to traditional designs used for the past seven decades.

Mechanical evaluation of fourth-generation composite femur hybrid locking plate constructs.

Locking compression plates are routinely used for open reduction and internal fixation of fractures. Such plates allow for locking or non-locking screw placement in each hole. A combined use of both types of screw application for stabilization of a fracture is commonly applied and referred to as hybrid internal fixation. Locking screws improve the stability of the fixation construct but at the expense of significant additional cost. This study experimentally analyzes various combinations of locking and non-locking screws under simultaneous axial and torsional loading to determine the optimal hybrid locking plate-screw construct in a fourth generation composite femur. Clinically it is necessary to ensure adequate fixation stability in a worse case fracture-bone quality scenario. A locking screw near the fracture gap increased the axial and torsional strength of the locked plate system. Greater removal torque remained in non-locked screws adjacent to locked screws compared to an all non-locking screws control group.

Time-dependent contamination of opened sterile operating-room trays.

BACKGROUND: There are no clear guidelines for how long a sterile operating-room tray can be exposed to the open environment before the contamination risk becomes unacceptable. The purpose of this study was to determine the time until first contamination and the rate of time-dependent contamination of sterile trays that had been opened in a controlled operating-room environment. We also examined the effect of operating-room traffic on the contamination rate. METHODS: Forty-five sterile trays were opened in a positive-air-flow operating room. The trays were randomly assigned to three groups. All trays were opened with use of sterile technique and were exposed for four hours. Culture specimens were obtained immediately after opening and every thirty minutes thereafter during the study period. Group 1 consisted of fifteen trays that were opened and left uncovered in a locked operating room (i.e., one with no traffic). Group 2 was identical to Group 1 with the addition of single-person traffic flowing in and out of the operating room from a nonsterile corridor every ten minutes. Group 3 included fifteen trays that were opened, immediately covered with a sterile surgical towel, and then left uncovered in a locked operating room (i.e., one with no traffic). RESULTS: Three of the thirty uncovered trays (one left in the operating room with traffic and two left in the room with no traffic) were found to be contaminated immediately after opening. After those three trays were eliminated, the contamination rates recorded for the twenty-seven uncovered trays were 4% (one tray) at thirty minutes, 15% (four) at one hour, 22% (six) at two hours, 26% (seven) at three hours, and 30% (eight) at four hours. There was no difference in survival time (p = 0.47) or contamination rate (p = 0.69) between the uncovered trays in the room with traffic and those in the room without traffic. The covered trays were not contaminated during the testing period. The survival time for those trays was significantly longer (p = 0.03) and the contamination rate was significantly lower (p = 0.02) than those for the uncovered trays. CONCLUSIONS: Culture positivity correlated directly with the duration of open exposure of the uncovered operating-room trays. Light traffic in the operating room appeared to have no impact on the contamination risk. Coverage of surgical trays with a sterile towel significantly reduced the contamination risk.

Uniplanar external fixation for care of circumferential extremity burn wounds in adults.

The optimal management of circumferential extremity burns remains a challenge. Elevation of the extremity to decrease wound swelling and avoid pressure at the point of contact on new skin grafts is a standard objective but can be frequently difficult to accomplish. Although various forms of elevation have been proposed, our purpose was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the uniplanar external fixation (UEF) device in providing extremity elevation and stabilization while optimizing skin grafting. Intraoperative application of either upper or lower extremity UEF was performed at the time of eschar excision and application of split-thickness autografts. Inclusion criterion was that patients should be over 16 years of age with third-degree circumferential extremity burns that were planned for autologous skin grafting within 48 hours after their injury. Patient consent was obtained in every case. Eight patients aged 17 to 62 with circumferential extremity burns were reviewed. No pin-tract infections were observed, nor were any of the skin grafts lost due to shearing. Peripheral nerve and arterial injuries were not encountered. Only one patient with an oversized arm secondary to morbid obesity had a pin pull-out. No other patient developed adverse sequelae from the surgery or from the placement of the UEF device. The UEF device provides a safe and effective means for elevation of extremites in patients with circumferential extremity burns undergoing skin grafting. This allows for optimal access for skin grafting, dressing changes, and postoperative positioning. Shear injury and pressure necrosis of the fresh grafts is minimized. Increasing the number of pins in obese patients should be considered to avoid the complications of pin pull-out.

Diagnosis and management of extremity compartment syndromes: an orthopaedic perspective.

More than 200,000 people in the United States are diagnosed annually with compartment syndrome. This condition is commonly established based on clinical parameters. Determining its presence, however, can be challenging in obtunded patients or those with an altered mental status. A delay in diagnosis and treatment of these injuries can result in significant morbidity. Surgical release of the enveloping fascia remains the acceptable standard treatment for compartment syndrome. This article reviews the evaluation and treatment of compartment syndrome.